Article 13 of the Indian Constitution: Laws inconsistent with or in derogation of fundamental rights

Article 13 of the Indian Constitution: Laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights.

Article 13 of the Indian Constitution is a significant provision that deals with the doctrine of judicial review and the supremacy of the Constitution. It plays a crucial role in safeguarding fundamental rights and ensuring that any law or provision inconsistent with the Constitution is declared void. In this comprehensive explanation, we will delve into the details of Article 13, its interpretation, and its significance within the Indian constitutional framework.

Article 13 is part of Part III of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees fundamental rights to all citizens. It falls under the chapter titled "Right to Equality," which includes Articles 14 to 18. These articles aim to ensure equality before the law and equal protection of the law for all individuals in India.

Let's examine the text of Article 13:

1. All laws in force in the territory of India immediately before the commencement of this Constitution, in so far as they are inconsistent with the provisions of this Part, shall, to the extent of such inconsistency, be void.

2. The State shall not make any law which takes away or abridges the rights conferred by this Part and any law made in contravention of this clause shall, to the extent of the contravention, be void.

3. In this article, unless the context otherwise requires,—

(a) "law" includes any Ordinance, order, bye-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usages having in the territory of India the force of law;

(b) "laws in force" includes laws passed or made by a Legislature or other competent authority in the territory of India before the commencement of this Constitution and not previously repealed, notwithstanding that any such law or any part thereof may not be then in operation either at all or in particular areas.

Article 13(1) states that any law in force in the territory of India immediately before the commencement of the Constitution, to the extent that it is inconsistent with the provisions of Part III (which includes fundamental rights), shall be deemed void. This provision ensures that any existing law that goes against the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution becomes unenforceable to the extent of such inconsistency. It signifies the supremacy of the Constitution and establishes that fundamental rights are of paramount importance.

Article 13(2) imposes a restriction on the State from making any law that takes away or curtails the rights conferred by Part III of the Constitution. If any law is made in contravention of this provision, it shall be deemed void to the extent of the contravention. This clause acts as a preventive measure to ensure that the State does not pass laws that infringe upon the fundamental rights of individuals. It reinforces the principle that fundamental rights are fundamental and cannot be easily curtailed or violated.

The significance of Article 13(1) and (2) lies in their role as a check on legislative power. These provisions empower the judiciary to review the constitutionality of laws and strike down those that are inconsistent with the fundamental rights enshrined in Part III. Judicial review is an essential feature of the Indian Constitution, and Article 13 is one of the key provisions that enable the courts to exercise this power.

The interpretation of Article 13 has evolved over time, primarily through judicial pronouncements by the Supreme Court of India. The courts have adopted a broad and liberal approach to the scope of Article 13, ensuring the protection and promotion of fundamental rights. The Supreme Court has held that any law that is inconsistent with any provision of Part III, including fundamental rights, is void ab initio, meaning it is void from the beginning and has no legal effect.

Furthermore, Article 13(3) provides definitions of certain terms used in the article. It clarifies that the term "law" includes not only legislative enactments but also other instruments that have the force of law, such as ordinances, orders, bye-laws, rules, regulations, notifications, customs, and usages. This expansive definition ensures that any form of law, whether passed by a legislature or another competent authority, is subject to the provisions of Article 13.

The term "laws in force" mentioned in Article 13(3)(b) refers to laws that were enacted by a legislature or competent authority before the commencement of the Constitution and were not previously repealed. This provision ensures that any existing law, even if it is not currently in operation, remains subject to judicial review if it violates the provisions of Part III.

Article 13 has far-reaching implications in protecting and upholding the fundamental rights of individuals. It serves as a safeguard against arbitrary and unconstitutional laws, allowing citizens to challenge the validity of such laws before the judiciary. Through the mechanism of judicial review, the courts can strike down laws that infringe upon fundamental rights, thereby ensuring their supremacy and protecting the rights and liberties of the people.

The doctrine of prospective overruling is another significant aspect associated with Article 13. It allows the courts to declare a law as unconstitutional but provides a specified period during which the law continues to operate in order to avoid chaos and disruption. This doctrine strikes a balance between protecting the Constitution and ensuring the smooth functioning of governance.

In conclusion, Article 13 of the Indian Constitution is a critical provision that upholds the supremacy of the Constitution and guarantees the protection of fundamental rights. It declares laws inconsistent with Part III of the Constitution as void and prohibits the State from making laws that infringe upon fundamental rights. Article 13 empowers the judiciary to review the constitutionality of laws and strike down those that violate the fundamental rights of individuals. By ensuring the primacy of the Constitution and providing a mechanism for judicial review, Article 13 plays a vital role in safeguarding the rights and liberties of the people and maintaining the rule of law in India.

Thank You