Article 21 of the Indian Constitution: Protection of life and personal liberty.

Article 21 of the Indian Constitution: Protection of life and personal liberty.

Article 21 of Part 3 of the Indian Constitution is a fundamental right that guarantees the protection of life and personal liberty. This article is one of the most important provisions in the Constitution and has been interpreted and expanded by the judiciary over the years to encompass various aspects of human rights and individual freedoms.

In this detailed explanation, we will explore the history, meaning, scope, and interpretations of Article 21, highlighting its significance in safeguarding the rights of Indian citizens. We will also examine landmark judgments that have shaped its interpretation and discuss the evolving understanding of the right to life and personal liberty in Indian jurisprudence.

 

Introduction:

The Indian Constitution, adopted on 26th January 1950, enshrines a comprehensive set of fundamental rights that protect the dignity and freedom of individuals. Article 21 of Part 3 is a crucial provision that guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. The framers of the Constitution recognized the importance of safeguarding these fundamental rights as essential for a just and democratic society.

 

History and Evolution:

To understand the significance of Article 21, it is essential to examine its historical context and the evolution of its interpretation. The concept of the right to life and personal liberty has deep roots in India's freedom struggle and the country's commitment to human rights.

The Indian freedom movement, led by prominent leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru, emphasized the importance of individual freedoms and the protection of human rights. These ideals influenced the drafting of the Constitution and the inclusion of fundamental rights.

 

Meaning and Scope:

Article 21 states, "No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to the procedure established by law." At its core, this provision protects the right to life and personal liberty from arbitrary deprivation. It ensures that the state cannot take away an individual's life or liberty without due process of law.

The term "life" in Article 21 has been interpreted expansively to include a broad range of rights and freedoms that are necessary for a dignified existence. It encompasses not only the physical aspect of life but also the right to live with dignity. The Supreme Court of India has held that the right to life includes the right to food, shelter, healthcare, education, and a clean environment.

Similarly, the term "personal liberty" has been interpreted to encompass various individual freedoms. It includes the freedom of movement, the right to privacy, the right to be free from torture and cruel treatment, and the right to personal autonomy.

 

Interpretations and Landmark Judgments:

Over the years, the judiciary has played a crucial role in interpreting and expanding the scope of Article 21. The Supreme Court of India has delivered several landmark judgments that have shaped the understanding of the right to life and personal liberty.

1. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978): This landmark judgment significantly expanded the scope of Article 21. The Supreme Court held that the right to life is not merely a physical existence but includes the right to live with dignity. The court ruled that any law depriving a person of personal liberty must satisfy the test of reasonableness and cannot be arbitrary.

2. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985): In this case, the Supreme Court held that the right to livelihood is an essential part of the right to life. The court emphasized that the state has a duty to provide opportunities for a decent livelihood and cannot arbitrarily deprive individuals of their means of livelihood.

3. Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997): The Supreme Court, in this judgment, recognized the right to a safe and secure working environment as a part of the right to life and personal liberty. The court formulated guidelines to prevent sexual harassment in the workplace, highlighting the importance of protecting the dignity and autonomy of individuals.

4. Selvi v. State of Karnataka (2010): In this case, the Supreme Court recognized the right to privacy as a fundamental aspect of personal liberty. The court held that the administration of certain scientific tests, such as narcoanalysis, without the consent of the accused violated their right to privacy and personal liberty.

5. Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018): In a historic judgment, the Supreme Court decriminalized consensual same-sex relationships, affirming that sexual orientation is an inherent aspect of an individual's identity. The court recognized that criminalizing homosexuality violated the right to life and personal liberty.

 

Conclusion:

Article 21 of the Indian Constitution is a cornerstone of individual freedoms and human rights. It protects the right to life and personal liberty from arbitrary deprivation and ensures that the state acts in accordance with the principles of fairness and due process of law. The judiciary has played a crucial role in interpreting and expanding the scope of this provision, recognizing that the right to life encompasses a broad range of rights and freedoms necessary for a dignified existence.

The evolving understanding of Article 21 reflects India's commitment to human rights and the principles of justice and equality. The judiciary's interpretation of this provision has contributed significantly to the protection of individual liberties and has set important precedents for future cases. As India continues its journey towards a more inclusive and rights-based society, Article 21 will remain a bedrock of constitutional protection for the right to life and personal liberty.

Thank You